top of page
  • Priyanshi Manyura

Competition Law and Developing Economies: A Complete Analysis

Priyanshi Manyura,

Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University

Competition Law and Developing Economies

Introduction

Antitrust law, or competition law in certain areas, can be seen as crucial in molding economic environments by guaranteeing markets function which cannot be considered in an isolated manner.  The law itself is critical in emerging markets  and can never guarantee to support competition, stimulate economic development, and protect consumer interests unless a range of other government policies conform to basic market principles. This law promotes market entry, innovation, and increased efficiency in businesses by banning anti-competitive behaviors like monopolies, cartels, and unfair trade practices. policies like trade policies, privatization, deregulation, regional policy etc needs to be conducted in a manner which is compatible with the market mechanism to function as an efficient economy. This article's motto is to investigate the important function of competition law in emerging economies, where issues such as market dominance and obstacles to entering the market can impede fair market involvement.

Objectives of Competition Law

The implementation of competition policy is frequently seen as promoting "economic efficiency" with fair competition in markets, which encourages competitiveness by setting up transparent regulations and also to maximize "Public interest, that safeguard the competitive process rather than specific competitors. Practically the difference between the law having multiple objectives is overstated with no economy following a rigid economic efficiency objective. Those objectives (Davidson)are actually designed to boost economic efficiency, foster economic growth and development, and enhance consumer welfare. Competition motivates companies to enhance their productivity, by cutting expenses and boosting innovation, research and development to satisfy consumer demands.

The significance or framework of competition law in stimulating economic growth and progress.

The significance of Competition is recognized for its capacity to stimulate economic growth and advancement through improving resource allocation and productivity in markets. To see this, we take it as a benchmark framework with the recently published by The World Bank and OECD.  Economic development relies on economic growth, which is determined by the rise in the production value of goods and services, and also includes factors like employment rates, literacy levels, and quality of life indicators.

Difficulties in Enforcing Antitrust Legislation in Developing Nations

In the emerging economies, enforcing competition law consists of major challenges despite its theoretical advantages. Competition authorities that have been recently set up typically do not have the necessary institutional capacity, resources, and expertise to effectively enforce the provisions stated in competition laws. This raises concerns about whether these economies can effectively apply and enforce competition regulations to promote sustainable economic growth.

"An assessment of the impacts of colorful public programs on competition is beyond the compass of this volume. With this a list of micro-industrial government policies that can support or adversely impinge on an application of competition policy would include:

● Trade policy, including tariffs, quotas, subsidies, antidumping actions, domestic content regulations, and export restraints.

●       Industrial policy

●       Regional development policy.

●       Intellectual property policy.

●       Privatization and regulatory reforms

●       Science and technology policy.

●       Investment and tax policies

●       Licenses for trades and professions." (Mehta1, 2002)

Perception from Real-World Experience

This law is based on real-world experience at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States, where enforcement agencies work together to enforce competition laws, and it is clear that effective enforcement of these laws depends on strong institutional structures and continuous efforts to build capacity. The antitrust laws here, support the unfettered markets in the lower prices and more choices by incorporating competition policies into overall economic plans to improve market efficiency, economic stability, and fair competition. Utilizing competition policies as part of wider economic reform efforts can help emerging economies utilize competition to spur innovation, increase productivity, and reach sustainable long-term economic growth.

Understanding Competition Law Dynamics Globally

Globally, the world has seen a significant hike in the growth in the number of laws dealing with competition over the last few years. Before there were only 12 jurisdictions around the world having had a competition law in 1970 but now there are more than 125 jurisdictions that maintain a competition regime with the vast majority of them conducting active competition enforcement activities(OECD,2020). 

The competition law of the European Union is codified under Articles 101 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union(TFEU). The convention covers prohibitions on agreements that have the object or effect of confining competition, abuse of dominance, and state aid. piecemeal from this main instrument, other rules, guidelines, and notices have also been issued to regulate other areas analogous as combinations and attention. The primary enforcer of these rules is the European Commission, which is responsible for functions including fact- finding, taking action against contraventions, and assessing penalties. Conduct for dissolution of Commission opinions in competition cases are first brought to the General Court, while prayers are heard by the Court of Justice. EU competition law is constantly applied by the Commission and the EU courts with consideration of single European request integration(European Parliament, 2019). The member countries also have their own domestic competition laws, modeled after Articles 101 and 102 of the TFEU, and domestic enforcement efforts are accepted by the 27 National Competition Authorities.

The United Kingdom’s legislative frame on competition was established by the Competition Act 1998 and the Enterprise Act 2002 and amended by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, which created the Competition and Markets Authority(CMA). The prohibitions in the UK law on abuse of dominant position and anti- competitive agreements were predicated on and sustained by original vittles in EU law(UK Parliament, 2021). A pivotal point of the UK competition governance is the concurrent powers held by different sectoral regulators for the enforcement of competition rules. Down from the CMA, other agencies enjoying a competition delegation include the Ofgem(energy), Ofwat(water), Ofcom (dispatches), and the Financial Conduct Authority(financial services).

In Canada, The Competition Act is one of the oldest competition administrations in the world, as Canada’s first legislation forbidding conspiracies and businesses in restraint of trade was formerly in place a time before the US enacted the Sherman Antitrust Act(Goldman, 2013). The law is executed by the Competition Bureau, while cases are adjudicated by the Competition Tribunal. piecemeal from traditional antitrust offenses like price- fixing, shot- vesture, and abuse of dominance, Canada’s competition law includes prohibitions on deceptive marketing practices, deceptive telemarketing, and aggregate schemes. (Tom Romanoff, 2021)

China’s Anti- Monopoly Law contains prohibitions on monopoly agreements, abuses of- competitive combinations, and abuses of administrative power. previously, China’s competition legislation was executed by three different agencies. In 2018, all antitrust powers were concentrated into a single agency, the State Administration for Market Regulation(SAMR), which is under the direct supervision of the State Council. The SAMR can delegate enforcement power to original authorities at the provincial, indigenous, or external position. Courts continue to retain their authorities to hear private marketable difficulties involving competition claims. (markets)

New Approaches or Strategies to Competition Policy for Economic Development

The requests and Competition Policy cluster of the World Bank Group works in more than 60 countries across regions, at the public, subnational and indigenous levels, to offer perpetration support, specialized advice and capacity structure on:

Designing pro-competition request regulation. Opening specific requests to competition, reducing government interventions that may shelter less effective enterprises, cover incumbents or grease conspiracy, including sector-specific non-supervisory design.

Embedding competition principles in broader public programs. Enforcing effective competition advocacy strategies, public competition programs, state aid, and investing competition principles in nonsupervisory reforms.

Reforming the competition frame and its perpetration. Design of anti-cartelprograms(includingcharity), junction control, request and competition analysis ways, institutional effectiveness of competition authorities, and advocacy strategies across government agencies.

Fostering competitive impartiality in requests with direct state participation. Designing mechanisms that minimize the distortive goods of impulses and state aid support and promote competitive impartiality among request players structure upon the World Bank Group requests and Competition Policy Assessment Tool(MCPAT), we give empirical exploration and profitable analysis as foundations for reform perpetration around three modules:

(1) Antitrust rules and enforcement;

(2)Pro-competition request and sector regulation;

(3) Competition principles in broader public programs, including SoEs and competitive impartiality. (Market and competition policies)

Conclusion

With the above information, this article provides a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between competition law and the developmental challenges faced by economies in the Global South within the WTO framework.  It tells about the global impact of this law in boosting the economic growth with efficiency and highlights how developing countries encounter significant obstacles in WTO negotiations, especially concerning competition policy, due to the inherent limitations of existing WTO concepts and language in addressing their unique developmental needs.

The article argues for the necessity of developing tailored frameworks and terminology that authentically capture the developmental aspirations of emerging economies. It proposes the establishment of a Development-Friendly International Competition Authority as a pivotal solution. This proposed authority would not only regulate and cover anti-competitive practices of large transnational pots, particularly those above a specified size threshold, but also oversee their growth strategies through combinations and accessions in a manner that preserves request contestability and effectiveness. likewise, the composition acknowledges the conservative approach of advanced husbandry towards relinquishing sovereignty for similar expansive transnational cooperation. It advocates for a phased perpetration of the proposed authority, starting with fact- finding and monitoring places, and gradationally expanding towards deeper North- South cooperation in alignment with the outlined principles. Eventually, the composition underscores the critical need for broader transnational agreement on indifferent profitable governance fabrics that empower developing husbandry to navigate global competition law effectively. It calls for combined sweats towards fostering inclusive profitable growth and development, icing that competition programs not only promote fair request practices but also contribute to sustainable development pretensions through all nations.

Bibliography

● Kenneth M. Daidson1, Economic Development, Competition, and Competition Law, https://cutsccier.org/pdf/Paper_Economic_Development_Competition_and_Competition_Law.pdf

● Market and competition policies ,https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/competition-policy (last visited July 9,2024)

● Pradeep S. Mehta,Competition Policies in developing countries: An Asia- Pacific Perspective,(2002),

● Global competition law and policy approaches to digital markets, (2024), https://unctad.org/publication/global-competition-law-and-policy-approaches-digital-markets

● Tom Romanoff, Comparision of competition Law and Policy in the US, EU,UK, China and Canada,(2021) , Biritsh Policy Center, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/comparison-of-competition-law-and-policy-in-the-us-eu-uk-china-and-canada/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments


bottom of page