.jpg)
Amirtha Lakshmi V,
School of Excellence in Law, Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University
The Supreme Court on 11 July 2024 (Thursday) brought up the prominent topic of how the uninformed or uneducated people in rural areas like Assam have to face serious difficulties to prove their Indian citizenship, due to a lack of official documents. The bench, consisting of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, mentioned the main problems in the system that prevents many people from possessing government-issued documents. This is mainly true for those people without property ownership.
The court first noticed the issues during the hearing of Md. Rahim Ali's case, who had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal (FT) because of the errors, such as spellings, and dates in his documentary evidence. Even though his name and his parents' names were appearing in voter lists since 1965, and thus, the FT declared him a foreigner due to a complaint without any evidence of support. This ruling that The High Court approved was eventually handed to the Supreme Court.
Rural Challenges in Documenting Citizenship
Justice Nath and Justice Amanullah added that it is a recurring phenomenon that a majority of the citizens in rural areas of the country find themselves unable to provide the authoritative government documents that are very essential. In addition, it is more common among those who do not possess property and have never been asked to present certified documents .The court noted that this scenario is widespread among the rural population in Assam.
“The prevalent situation on the ground is such that uninformed or illiterate persons, or those not well-informed, often lack any official document issued by the government, State or Central,” declared the bench. The problem is further exacerbated by historical reasons like lower literacy levels and the absence of documentation in earlier decades.
“The situation on the ground is such that the people who are uninformed or the illiterate, or those not informed properly by the government, state or central do not possess any official document,” declared the bench. The problem is further exacerbated by historical reasons like lower literacy levels and the absence of documentation in earlier decades.
Literacy and Historical Context
The literacy figure reached 72.19% in Assam as per the 2011 Census, during the 1960s and 1970s it was even lower. Thus, the context is clear that the documents that are now considered necessary and have to be shown to prove citizenship there were not in practice in the past thus most of the older generation and families were not included in the census, The court also simplified the common problem of the name spelling variation in the electoral rolls through the presentation of case. The court argued that small inconsistencies should not be a reason to doubt people's citizenship.
“It is very usual to see such variations in the preparation of the Electoral Roll,” the court said, it hesitated adding that non-serious entries by officials should not severely harm individuals.
Electoral Roll and Name Discrepancies
The Supreme Court points out that the name on a government document can fluctuate due to differences in language. It is a widespread occurrence throughout India and should not be used to reject the legitimacy of such documents. Help as many of these three are live in the bottom of the ideas box if necessary. "In several States, person’s names on substantial government documentation can be misspelled in different languages, whether it is English, Hindi, Bangla, Assamese, or any other language,” the bench elucidated.
The situation of Md. Rahim Ali was underlined by the last ones. He was the object of the claim that he moved from Bangladesh to Assam illegally after March 25, 1971. Discrepancies in the ways things were written and dates of his documents, Ali still managed to show positive evidence of his family’s long-term putting down in the Electoral Rolls. Their name produces nearly 70% of mobile phone advertising results in Bangladesh, their main focus area.
Case Background and Key Issues
Md. Rahim Ali was removed from Assam's list of foreigners by the (FT) in Assam because of issues with his documents. Although contrary evidence that his family has resided in Assam since 1965 was shown. He handed over electoral roll entries from 1985 and 1997, but the FT and Guwahati High Court vouched for the order that was given, as they dismissed his complaints of trivial spelling and date inconsistences. Ali's counsel countered his health problems causing late submission of the document in tandem with the fact that the discrepancies were one of the minor reasons. The case made procedural fairness and stringent evidentiary requirements under the Foreigners Act. a point of concern.
Supreme Court’s Decision
In its final decision, the Supreme Court stated that Md. Rahim Ali, who is an Indian native, was only absent from the tribunal. The court pointed out that the problem was not enough to disbelieve him. Taking into account the surroundings in the countryside and resulting common practices, the trial insisted the name competition be considered.
This particular ruling brings to the fore the problem of proof of citizenship in remote locations of the rural sector, where there are many building blocks existing due to obstacles like historical factors and systemic problems in recording citizenship. Hearing calls for consideration and a more empathetic way of resolution that is to say the citizens who are the real deal citizens but they are held responsible for the bureaucratic and procedural system's faults.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court judgment Md. Rahim Ali - Court case is an epitome of the obstacles that rural dwellers go through in proving citizenship. By means of its identification of the systemic issues and it is already known flaws in paperwork, the court has created a way of solving the issue by means of fair and equal treatment. With the increasing dilemma of records and identification, this ruling is an inclination to be more inclusive in such discussions so that the human side as well as compassion is brought to favour.
References
· Supreme Court of India, Case No. Diary No. 20674 of 2017, Md. Rahim Ali @ Abdur Rahim v. State of Assam & Ors.
· Census of India, 2011, Literacy Rate in Assam.
· LiveLaw, "Indian Citizenship Should Not Be Doubted Due to Minor Variations in Name Spellings in Electoral Rolls or Government Records – Supreme Court," LiveLaw, July 11, 2024, https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/indian-citizenship-should-not-be-doubted-due-to-minor-variations-in-name-spellings-in-electoral-rolls-or-govt-records-supreme-court-263234
Comments